Strike!

Daily Mail splashToday’s Daily Mail has a rather sensationalist take on the news that about 850,000 council workers are going on strike.* However, even if you hate the laziness of journalists who talk about a ‘spring of discontent’ followed by a ‘summer of discontent’ and so on (as Kevin Maguire says in this week’s Tribune), you can’t deny that strikes are in the air.

It’s not just the local government workers in the union Unison – although that covers a very wide variety of people, from social workers to dinner ladies, sorry,  catering staff. This autumn sees a strike ballot by civil servants in the PCS union, which could see 280,000 people on strike.

And one union – the GMB – told me yesterday that they want to revise the NHS pay deal for 1.3 million staff – which was only agreed last week.

The reason for all this is, of course, inflation and the rising cost of food, fuel and energy in particular. It is those costs, and not pay rises, which are responsible for the sharp increase in the rate of inflation this year, according to Bank of England governor Mervyn King. He said last week that inflation measured accoriding to the CPI – the government way – will hit 4 per cent this year. Council workers were being offered 2.45 per cent.

The real issue is not, I think, the effect that those strike days will have on local services or the economy, but whether the government’s belt-tightening pay policy will still hold in the face of over 2 million refuseniks. Ideally they would like to see 2 per cent pay rises all round, which – they say – will help bring inflation under control. And it’s true that Mervyn King says inflation will come back under control if only we don’t spend too much or pay ourselves too much.

But the unions won’t stand for that. Unison, which is also party to the NHS pay deal, isn’t threatening to reopen talks just yet, but from what I’m learning they will probably do so in a few months – just as the PCS union starts balloting for strike action.

Be in no doubt – Brown and Darling are being tested, and tested hard. David Cameron is already cheerfully talking about how Labour is in a “stranglehold” because of union funding. We may not be about to witness a winter of discontent like 1978-79, it could bring down the Government all the same.

*Update, 12 July: Actually, only about 600,000 workers are due to go on strike, since only the English, Welsh and Northern Irish Unison members were balloted. Scottish members – who make up the remaining 250,000 – are being balloted seperately.

Advertisements

Tags: , , , ,

3 Responses to “Strike!”

  1. Enoch Was Right Says:

    How can it bring down the government?

    Explain please.

    I don’t quite see the mechanism. Perhaps I am being dense.

  2. lastreporter Says:

    Well, if Labour is perceived to be in hock to the unions it will harm them at the ballot box. This is potentially, I think, a big issue. David Cameron has barely begun to explore it since Labour started really sliding hard in the polls this year.

    If the Warwick II neogtiations don’t go smoothly, and the National Policy Forum gets messy, the unions could get shirty. The more militant ones will make noises about withdrawing funding (though I doubt they’ll do it, at least not in an overt manner and not most of their funding). We still don’t know how Labour will fund the 2010 election campaign, and neither does Brown.

    Plus – and more straightforwardly – if Leicester Square fills up with bin bags again, as it did in 2002 I think, during a local government strike, people will blame the government, won’t they? It’s only my opinion and I wouldn’t bank on it, but I suspect that the mere sight of lots of picket lines and statistics about pay demands and working hours lost will damage Labour if union after union goes on strike – which is currently looking likely.

  3. Enoch Was Right Says:

    Sorry for slowness in replying…

    I see your point and I thought that your comment “bring down the government” meant in an immediate sense ie parliamentary revolt et al rather than just a general seepage. Take your point about funding although this is party not government.

    Anyway, since we are now using the R word openly I think this will have a bigger impact.

    But anyway, I have some scraps in the bin I had better cook up for breakfast…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: